A10G vs Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A10G 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
9200 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10G
+121130%
31520
Quadro FX 360M
26
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
2
9216
Shading Units
16
288
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
17W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
G86
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
