A10G vs Quadro FX 770M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A10G 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
9184 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 770M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10G
+39300%
31520
Quadro FX 770M
80
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
4
9216
Shading Units
32
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
G96
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
