3D Rage IIC PCI vs Quadro FX 4000 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (256GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Apr 2004
Rage 2
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
256MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
1
TMUs
12
1
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
4x SDI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
NV41
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Rage 2
Architecture
Curie
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
3.0
