3D Rage IIC PCI vs RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 27 years late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Apr 2024
Rage 2
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
4GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
768
1
TMUs
24
1
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GA107
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
500 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
-
Shader Model
6.8
