Home Comparison 3D Rage IIC PCI vs Radeon Instinct MI350X

3D Rage IIC PCI vs Radeon Instinct MI350X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI350X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Instinct MI350X 's Advantages
Released 27 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
19456 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Apr 1997
Release Date
Jan 2025
Rage 2
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2MB
Memory Size
288GB
SDR
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
-
Shading Units
19456
1
TMUs
1216
1
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Rage IIC
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram X
Rage IIC PCI (215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
153 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

5.0
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net