3D Rage IIC PCI vs NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Nov 2015
Rage 2
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
2GB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Shading Units
512
1
TMUs
32
1
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
68W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GM107
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Maxwell
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
-
Shader Model
5.1
