3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.400GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Oct 2009
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1024MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GT218
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
-
Shader Model
4.1
