3D Rage IIC PCI vs H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 27 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Nov 2024
Rage 2
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
141GB
SDR
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
132
-
Shading Units
16896
1
TMUs
528
1
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GH100
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Hopper
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
80 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
-
Shader Model
N/A
