3D Rage IIC PCI vs FirePro W5000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Aug 2012
Rage 2
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
2GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
-
Shading Units
768
1
TMUs
48
1
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Rage 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
Shader Model
5.1
