Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +942%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2020
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
48
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
400W
550 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy