Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +810%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Feb 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy