Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +173%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm +207%
372
Quadro K2200
121
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm +90%
63
Quadro K2200
33
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
640
224
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
68W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy