Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X
3.935 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +1458%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2023
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
2688
Shading Units
6144
224
TMUs
384
48
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
1536 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
295W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy