Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA GRID K560Q

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA GRID K560Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 4GB VRAM GRID K560Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K560Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
GRID K560Q +122%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

238W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy