Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1500MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +2480%
22.27 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

58
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7424
Shading Units
384
232
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy