Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +5780%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
8
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy