Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W7170M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W7170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +201%
8.94 TFLOPS
FirePro W7170M
2.961 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy