Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +59900%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300 SE
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
8
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G98S
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy