Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V7750

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V7750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock 2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 76W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2243%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620MHz
Base Clock
-
2130MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000MHz
Memory Clock
900MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0 GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80 GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12MB
L2 Cache
128KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
512.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 GL XTX
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18,900 million
Transistors
514 million
159mm²
Die Size
146mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
76W
250W
Suggested PSU
250W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy