Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +14900%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
2816
Shading Units
80
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy