Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 70W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV380
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy