Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (32W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6300
3.133 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +27%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
32
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 24 XL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x HDMI 2.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy