Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 20GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Lower TDP (175W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (848.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti +724%
67.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1325 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6X
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
848.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
110
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
14080
256
TMUs
440
64
ROPs
144
-
Tensor Cores
440
-
RT Cores
110
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
345.6 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1056 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
67.58 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
67.58 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1056 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
AD102
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
AD102-225-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
400W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy