Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 A375 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 129% (2115MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 A375
1.299 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +900%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
All-In-One
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
10
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
40.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
1299 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Venus
GPU Name
AD107
Venus XTX (216-0846033)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy