Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
VSA-101
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
15W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy