Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI Radeon X1650

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV516
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy