Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +1721%
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6350
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
2
1024
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cedar
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy