Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA T400

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +51%
1.658 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
May 2021
Radeon Pro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
10
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
TU117
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy