Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD FirePro M6000

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD FirePro M6000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +980%
11.06 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2012
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Base Clock
-
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
786 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
10
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
345.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Heathrow
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
43W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy