Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
11968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +2012%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
208
Compute Units
-
13312
Shading Units
1344
832
TMUs
112
0
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK104
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy