Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
4592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +57323%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
16
288
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G86
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
10W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy