Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1936%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
384
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
51W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy