Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 102% (1770MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 +223%
16.31 TFLOPS
Tesla K40m
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
2880
288
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK110B
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
245W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy