Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe

AI GPU We compared a Professional market GPU: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 and a GPU: 40GB VRAM A100 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1770MHz vs 1410MHz)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (40GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1555GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000
16.31 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe +19%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
765 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
40GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1555GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
6912
288
TMUs
432
96
ROPs
160
576
Tensor Cores
432
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
40 MB

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GA100
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy