Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1354MHz vs 1215MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q +932%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy