Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
GRID K200 +65%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy