Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1354MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +902%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
6912
32
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy