Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40t

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40t

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40t to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1480MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40t 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Tesla K40t +66%
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
2880
64
TMUs
240
40
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GK110B
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
245W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy