Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1480MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +71%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
2880
64
TMUs
240
40
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GK110B
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy