Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1165MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5500 Mobile +126%
4.772 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1165 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
1344
128
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

74.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
149.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.772 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
149.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy