Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M +108%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M5000M +127%
275
Quadro K2200
121
OctaneBench
Quadro M5000M +84%
61
Quadro K2200
33
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GM107
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
68W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy