Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1395MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +579%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
924 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy