Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 1024MB VRAM GRID K140Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +330%
1.405 TFLOPS
GRID K140Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK107
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy