Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K500

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM GRID K500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K500 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
GRID K500 +62%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy