Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 73% (1950MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +362%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
DG2-128
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy