Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla K20X +10%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
2688
192
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy