Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 83% (1410MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (80GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1935GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB +448%
19.49 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
A100 PCIe 80 GB +1204%
3823
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1935GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
6912
192
TMUs
432
48
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy