Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 117% (1700MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
12736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +2171%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
220
1344
Shading Units
14080
112
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
153 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
600W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy