Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +333%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
256
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF100
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
142W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy