Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000M +42%
2.995 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4200
176
Quadro M5000M +56%
275
OctaneBench
Quadro K4200
32
Quadro M5000M +90%
61
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.995 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM204
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
N16E-Q5-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy